Free Consultation 877.583.2524
We do not handle social security disability claims
logo celebrating

Nationwide Leaders in Disability Insurance Law

shook hands

Judge Determines Hartford Abused Its Discretion in Long Term Disability Termination

Friday, April 5th, 2013

A New York Federal Judge has reversed a determination made by Hartford Insurance Company to terminate benefits to a woman suffering from Multiple Sclerosis. The Court determined that Hartford had abused its discretion in terminating the claim, where it based its decision upon its typical claimant approach — “finding” inconsistencies in the record, assigning the file to its Special Investigations Unit, conducting surveillance, and having a field representative interview the claimant, coupled with a paper only physician review by a well known insurance pandering doctor.

The Court found that the various bases upon which Hartford relied upon for its claim determination were lacking, and determined that the claimant was entitled to her long term disability insurance benefits. Hartford relied upon results of surveillance, which revealed the claimant walking her new baby, and running an errand, as well as the results of the filed visit, where the claimant was shown the surveillance and acknowledged that this represented her usual level of activity.

Following this activity, Hartford obtained a medical review from Dr. Bruce LeForce, a doctor well known in the industry and providing insurance favorable reports on a myriad of medical conditions. The claimant had also secured Social Security disability benefits, which permitted Hartford to reap a financial benefit of reducing its obligations to the claimant.

The Court was troubled by several aspects of Hartford’s claim handling. First, the Court did not accept Hartford’s short shrift of the Social Security award and finding. Next, the Court was bothered by the incomplete medical review undertaken by Hartford’s paid reviewers, and third, the Court did not believe the surveillance constituted substantial evidence to dispute her ongoing claim.

Thus, the Court granted benefits to the claimant and reversed Hartford’s decision.

Ingravallo v. Hartford Life

Jason A. Newfield

Written By:

Jason A. Newfield - Disability Insurance Attorney

Jason Newfield is a founding partner of the disability insurance law firm Frankel & Newfield. He has spent the majority of his legal career advocating for the rights of disabled workers. He has lectured other professionals, worked on a Federal Advisory committee, and published many articles in the field of disability insurance claims and litigation.

Learn more about Jason | See Jason’s Publications



Ready To Talk?

Fill out the form to request a FREE legal consultation

Sorry, we do not handle SSDI/Social Security claims.

Frankel & Newfield does not currently handle any Social Security Disability Insurance claims.


*Required fields are marked

I have read the disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


This is about a Social Security Disability claim.

Ipad image

Download Our Free eBook


Secrets the Disability Insurance Companies Don't Want You to know!

Sign Up for our mailing list to receive disability insurance law updates

Your information is 100% secure and will never be shared with anyone


No matter where you are nationwide, we are here to help.

We have the resources and support to take on the largest insurance companies.

Contact us today for our nationwide service.

Contact Us
Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming