Free Consultation 877.583.2524
We do not handle social security disability claims
logo celebrating

Nationwide Leaders in Disability Insurance Law

shook hands

Federal Court Finds Mutual Of Omaha Arbitrary And Capricious In LTD Denial

Thursday, February 4th, 2016

A Federal Court in Wisconsin has determined that a claimant should be entitled to pursue her Long Term Disability insurance benefits and that Mutual of Omaha improperly denied the claim on the basis of a pre-existing condition limitation in the policy.

The claimant originally injured her shoulder while shoveling snow, and began treatment for these difficulties. After continued medical workup of her shoulder problems, an MRI revealed lesions that were likely representing metastatic disease potentially from breast or lung cancer. Ultimately, she was diagnosed with lung cancer.

During the claim review process, Mutual of Omaha considered and determined that the claimant was actually treated for lung cancer during her look back period for potential application of the pre-existing limitation. Mutual of Omaha continued to advance this position, based upon the fact that her shoulder pain was in fact due to the cancer which had spread. On its appeal consideration, Mutual of Omaha relied upon one of its in-house medical directors, Dr. Reeder, to decide the claim. The Court was particularly troubled by Dr. Reeder’s “self-serving letter” to the claimant’s doctor, seeking a sign off on his characterization of the record.

In litigation, the Court’s consideration of the issues centered around whether the treatment for her shoulder injury, including medication, and physical therapy were for her cancer.

Because there was no record evidence that any of the claimant’s treating providers suspected cancer as a diagnosis, as the Court noted “was not even on the radar screen,” the retrospective effort by Mutual of Omaha to attribute her impairment to the pre-existing condition limitation failed.

Predicated upon Mutual of Omaha’s claim handling conduct and the success achieved in litigation, the Court permitted the claimant to pursue her attorney’s fees.

Kaiser v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

Jason A. Newfield

Written By:

Jason A. Newfield - Disability Insurance Attorney

Jason Newfield is a founding partner of the disability insurance law firm Frankel & Newfield. He has spent the majority of his legal career advocating for the rights of disabled workers. He has lectured other professionals, worked on a Federal Advisory committee, and published many articles in the field of disability insurance claims and litigation.

Learn more about Jason | See Jason’s Publications



Ready To Talk?

Fill out the form to request a FREE legal consultation

Sorry, we do not handle SSDI/Social Security claims.

Frankel & Newfield does not currently handle any Social Security Disability Insurance claims.


*Required fields are marked

I have read the disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


This is about a Social Security Disability claim.

Ipad image

Download Our Free eBook


Secrets the Disability Insurance Companies Don't Want You to know!

Sign Up for our mailing list to receive disability insurance law updates

Your information is 100% secure and will never be shared with anyone


No matter where you are nationwide, we are here to help.

We have the resources and support to take on the largest insurance companies.

Contact us today for our nationwide service.

Contact Us
Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming