Free Consultation 877.583.2524
We do not handle social security disability claims
logo celebrating

Nationwide Leaders in Disability Insurance Law

shook hands

Court Reverses Met Life Denial of Long Term Disability Claim

Wednesday, May 7th, 2014

A Federal Judge in Washington has decided that Met Life’s claim determination, to deny a claim for long term disability insurance benefits, must be reversed, where it determined that the claim decision was an abuse of discretion.

The claimant, a former flight attendant for American Airlines, suffered from pulmonary dysfunction and headaches. Her claim was denied by Met Life, and her administrative appeal, which provided extensive medical records, and other claim support, failed to alter Met Life’s claim determination.

On appeal, Met Life sought to have a peer review conducted, by Dr. Daniel Gerstenblitt, a regular reviewer in the disability insurance community. Dr. Gerstenblitt determined that there was no objective evidence to support disability, despite her doctor strongly advocating that her near daily debilitating headaches were impairing her ability to work.

The Court noted that Dr. Gerstenblitt’s medical review was “narrowly focused”, as he stated that he could “only look at objective medical evidence” and cannot substantiate the need for limitations or restrictions based upon self reported symptoms. The Court was troubled that Dr. Gerstenblitt was not clear about what objective evidence could be offered to substantiate the severity of her headaches.

The claimant was also awarded Social Security disability benefits. On a further appeal to the appeals committee, her claim was reviewed by other insurance friendly providers, including Dr. Sonne and Dr. Varpetian. Both doctors issues reports supporting the insurers’ desired outcome.

The Court criticized the claim review process, noting that the administrator may not pick and choose between portions of medical records, or ignore portions of records favorable to a claim in favor of other records to the contrary. The Court also found that credibility determinations are best handled by treating doctors rather than file reviewing doctors. As a result, the Court determined that the claim determination was not the product of a reasoned deliberate process, but, rather, was an abuse of discretion. Supporting its conclusion was the rejection and disregard of all supportive medical records, the failure to consider the award of Social Security, the failure to consider any subjective evidence, and the cherry picking of the records.

The Court thus ordered the claim back for a remand for further consideration.

Williams v. Met Life

Categories

Archives

Ready To Talk?

Fill out the form to request a FREE legal consultation

Sorry, we do not handle SSDI/Social Security claims.

Frankel & Newfield does not currently handle any Social Security Disability Insurance claims.

CLOSE

*Required fields are marked

I have read the disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

CLOSE

This is about a Social Security Disability claim.

Ipad image

Download Our Free eBook

FILING A DISABILITY INSURANCE CLAIM

Secrets the Disability Insurance Companies Don't Want You to know! Download Now

HELPING THE DISABLED NATIONWIDE

No matter where you are nationwide, we are here to help.

We have the resources and support to take on the largest insurance companies.

Contact us today for our nationwide service.

CHAT
NOW