Free Consultation 877.583.2524
We do not handle social security disability claims
logo celebrating

Nationwide Leaders in Disability Insurance Law

shook hands

Aetna Ordered To Trial In Connecticut Federal Court On ERISA Disability Case

Wednesday, July 10th, 2019

A Federal Judge in Connecticut has ordered Aetna to trial on a denial of group long term disability insurance claim, under ERISA.

The Court denied the parties’ motions for summary judgment, and has stated that “A trial will be scheduled for the earliest date.”

The parties submitted competing reports from experts – Aetna relying upon a report from Coventry Health (a company it purchased) as its source of “independent” evidence, while the claimant submitted a report which addressed and rebutted the Coventry report, and supported why the claimant remained impaired.

The rationale behind the Court’s decision related to Aetna’s deficient vocational assessment – a common theme in Aetna claims.

The Court was troubled by the vocational assessment and the failures to properly consider the issues, instead of focusing upon functional capacity levels of sedentary or light or otherwise.

In seeking to decide the case, the Court employed the de novo standard of review, on the basis of findings of violations of ERISA and under Halo v Yale Health, which allowed the Court to modify the standard of review and implement a de novo review. However, even with the ability upon de novo review to reach these conclusions and determine eligibility, the Court still determined that material issues of fact prevented judgment at this time. The Court will surely be seeking to adjudicate the credibility of the witnesses who have authored the respective vocational reports.

One of the critical issues which remains open includes Aetna’s failure to assess the possibility of accommodations to engage in certain work.

As this case proceeds in the District of Connecticut, we will be eagerly watching, as a trial will require Aetna to expose issues concerning its claim handling and processes, and its clear anti-claimant bias will be readily revealed.

Schumjan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

Justin C Frankel

Written By:

Justin C. Frankel - Disability Insurance Attorney

Justin Frankel is a founding partner of the disability insurance law firm Frankel & Newfield and is a highly skilled litigator and advocate. He has published numerous articles on the challenges facing clients with private or individual disability insurance policies and those who own group or ERISA disability insurance policies.

Learn more about Justin | See Justin’s Publications



Ready To Talk?

Fill out the form to request a FREE legal consultation

Sorry, we do not handle SSDI/Social Security claims.

Frankel & Newfield does not currently handle any Social Security Disability Insurance claims.


*Required fields are marked

I have read the disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


This is about a Social Security Disability claim.

Ipad image

Download Our Free eBook


Secrets the Disability Insurance Companies Don't Want You to know!

Sign Up for our mailing list to receive disability insurance law updates

Your information is 100% secure and will never be shared with anyone


No matter where you are nationwide, we are here to help.

We have the resources and support to take on the largest insurance companies.

Contact us today for our nationwide service.

Contact Us
Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming