Frankel & Newfield, P.C.

We Have Recovered Over $100 Million In Claims For Our Clients

Call for a Free Consult 866-504-8773
WE DO NOT HANDLE SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMS

Claimant Wins In Federal Court Litigation in Pursuit Of LTD Benefits Against Aetna

A claimant has succeeded in getting a Federal Court to overturn a decision by Aetna to terminate benefits to a claimant who suffered from cancer and later from significant orthopedic conditions of the cervical and lumbar spine as well as depression. Aetna terminated the claim after a peer review, when a doctor is hired to review records only and the doctor does not examine or meet the claimant. On appeal of the terminated claim, Aetna again engaged various peer reviews, none of whom met or examined the claimant.

The Court determined that Aetna had improperly terminated benefits, finding that the support from the claimant’s physician was “sounder than those presented by the peer reviewers,” which the Court found were largely presented in conclusory fashion, making it unclear how they reached such starkly contrasting results from those of the claimant’s provider. Another factor leading the Court’s decision was Aetna’s failure to follow the recommendation of one of its peer reviewers to procure neurocognitive testing to assess the level of cognitive impairment, which led the Court to conclude that the basis of the opinions were lacking.

The Court thus granted benefits to the claimant for the own occupation portion of her claim, and remanded the claim back to Aetna for consideration of further benefits under the any occupation stage – a change in definition of disability in the claimant’s policy.

It should be noted that the standard of review in this case was de novo, which allowed the Court to substitute its judgment for the insurance company’s decision. Had this case been decided under the abuse of discretion standard of review, it is possible that the Court would have upheld the claim determination, as that standard largely adjudicates whether Aetna’s claim process was appropriate and whether there was some substantial evidence to support the claim determination, a much more favorable standard of review for insurance companies.

Carrier v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Download Our Free Ebook

E-book Download Book
Super Lawyers | Justin AV Preeminent | Justin Avvo | 10.0 | Top Attorney | Justin Super Lawyers | Jason AV Preeminent | Jason Avvo | 9.8 | Top Attorney | Jason

HELPING THE DISABLED NATIONWIDE

  • tick

    No matter where you are nationwide, we are here to help.

  • tick

    We have the resources and support to take on the largest insurance companies.

  • tick

    Contact us today for our nationwide service. Contact Us

FN

Frankel & Newfield, P.C.
585 Stewart Avenue
Suite 312
Garden City, NY 11530

Toll Free: 866-504-8773
Fax: 516-222-0513
Map & Directions